No matter how many times a false statement is repeated, it does not become true. Downloading music files has nothing to do with our support of musicians. And to this day I haven't heard anyone prove the opposite. If by proof you mean that by buying a compact disc you thus send the money to the artist, then you are very naive indeed. As a person who directly works with major labels I can tell you that when you buy a compact disc the artist gets 0 dollars 0 cents. Period.
If a musician chooses to make a living by selling copies of files in the age of information technology, then he is an idiot.
If a software company chooses a business model of selling copies of files and labeling millions of people criminals, then they are not only idiots, they are also very unethical people, to put it mildly.
As for 3d modelers and graphic designers, those people have nothing to do with the problems of copyright - none of them make a living by selling copies of their works.
You have to understand that the story of a "starving musician" is a myth. Look around, for Gods sake! I know about a hundred professional musicians personally, some of them are pretty popular, some of them are pretty well paid and NONE, I repeat this - NONE of them make a living by selling copies of their music. Why don't they starve?
If you believe that it is okay for projects like TPB to go down simply because you think they are making a lot of money, I would advice focusing on counting your profits, not somebody else's. Yeah, and read up on bandwidths costs too. Are you running a web portal? If not, how can you judge the expenses? I am running a portal. It's not even near the size and activity of TPB, yet I am spending quite a significant sum of money to keep it up.
And, in conclusion, I love the song. It is great and I love the message - it's simple and very sincere.