[piano improvisation] Golden Ratio Tuning (mp3)

Started by uncloned, February 13, 2009, 01:16:37

Previous topic - Next topic

uncloned



Mike (aka Spectra at traxinspace) made a tuning based on the Golden Ratio

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_ratio

I performed an improvisation with it:

http://micro.soonlabel.com/golden/golden2.mp3

and then ran that improvisation through two more tunings

Lucy tuning: which is kind of unfair because Mike's tuning repeats every 13th note and Lucy tuning repeats at 12.

http://micro.soonlabel.com/golden/goldenlucy.mp3

and a 13 note subset of 31 notes per octave which fits better.

http://micro.soonlabel.com/golden/golden13of31.mp3

psishock

I'm as calm as a synth without a player.  (Sam_Zen)

Sam_Zen

Ah, the golden ratio...
Of course it could be implied in different ways, frequency of notes, the order of notes, and maybe more.
So, technically, why 31 notes per octave ? According to the ratio it should be 34..
0.618033988

uncloned

Quote from: "psishock"Listened.

Thanks Psi - :-)

uncloned

Quote from: "Sam_Zen"Ah, the golden ratio...
Of course it could be implied in different ways, frequency of notes, the order of notes, and maybe more.
So, technically, why 31 notes per octave ? According to the ratio it should be 34..

That's because several tuning schemes were used. The one that mentions a "a 13 note subset of 31 notes per octave" does not have anything to do the golden ratio.

Mike's golden ration tuning used the number (what is it 1.68... or something) in a way to bound his set of pitches. I think he tried using it as the octave and I midi recorded my performance of his tuning. That let me later run the same improvisation though the VSTi with the other two tunings.

Sam_Zen

0.618033988

uncloned

yeah that's right !

I think he used the inverse 1.68...

Sam_Zen

Yep, that's the unique thing about this number. The only one, if inversed, shows the same string of numbers after 0. or 1.
0.618033988