Author Topic: [controlled random] Fast Air (ogg)  (Read 7029 times)

Offline Rakib

  • Crazy artist
  • ****
  • Posts: 901
  • Operating System: win7x64
[controlled random] Fast Air (ogg)
« Reply #15 on: January 11, 2009, 03:47:38 »
I know what fractals are, and the the randomness you get by using it. But still this song doesn't give my anything on what we can call musical value.

I often use, radomize parameters with vst's I have, and then tweak it from there. But this is just music with no meaning at all.
^^

Offline uncloned

  • Extreme artist
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,741
    • http://www.chrisvaisvil.com
  • Operating System: Sam Zen - RIP
[controlled random] Fast Air (ogg)
« Reply #16 on: January 11, 2009, 03:51:26 »
I think its a matter of perspective.

some people swear by it, especially academics.

but then some people swear by 12-tone serialism too.

most people swear AT 12-tone serialism though...

Offline Sam_Zen

  • Extreme artist
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,689
    • http://www.xs4all.nl/~samzen/
[controlled random] Fast Air (ogg)
« Reply #17 on: January 11, 2009, 10:26:34 »
LOL
hm, maybe I shouldn't have used the term 'random' in the first place.
These things are just rendered by fractal formulas, with settings by me.
No musical value ? Whatever..
With Fast Air, I was just wondering, if any listener had heard the difference between the first and the last repetition.
0.618033988

Offline uncloned

  • Extreme artist
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,741
    • http://www.chrisvaisvil.com
  • Operating System: Sam Zen - RIP
[controlled random] Fast Air (ogg)
« Reply #18 on: January 11, 2009, 16:20:26 »
nope, I can't hear a big difference.

it seems to be like this - the atonalism is so intense that it takes the central place in my mind and washes out the subtleties as it were.