Started by Saga Musix, November 15, 2008, 13:55:26
QuoteNowadays, is a difference of, say, 300KB really that significant
Quote from: "Jojo"In his articles about his softsynth, kb/farbrausch pointed out that saving patterns row by row is just "stupid" and that saving them "channel by channel" (first downwards, then left to right) is better, e.g. for compression - redundant data can be compressed easily. So I thought that we could do that in the MPTM format as well...?
Quote from: "Jojo"I'm always optimizing for size, no matter how much it improves the size.
Quote from: "Jojo"Just because we have the resources, doesn't mean we have to waste them.
QuoteEven at the cost of performance and wasting time on something completely irrelevant?