Started by Brozilla, July 05, 2016, 06:21:38
QuoteSo who wants to make a song together?
Quote from: monsterovich on July 05, 2016, 11:37:18QuoteSNES stuffDrop it. I prefer only high quality samples and I hate chiptunes. But, I'm ready.
Quote from: FreezeFlame(Alchemy) on July 05, 2016, 17:00:14Why not. Im ready.
QuoteTbh your offer is a bit more tempting, maybe it's possible to do a 3-way?
QuoteNever collabed before but want the experience.
Quoteyou'd probably be easier to work with (maybe.... )
QuoteBefore cuffing the nail there is one last criteria for anyone. No more than 16 channels. Realize that there are some who organizes their channels based on the instrument being played but the rational behind it is having no more than the "necessary" allocation will allow everything to be seen at run-time. The argument can also be made I'm no fan of seeing a lot of empty space but once the actual song is finished we can increase the channels to add bells and whistles.
QuoteWhat about the max. size of the module
Quote from: Saga Musix on July 06, 2016, 21:53:42others call it a challenge.
Quote from: FreezeFlame(Alchemy) on July 06, 2016, 21:12:37What about the max. size of the module, and in which format it is going to be?
Quote from: monsterovich on July 06, 2016, 22:12:55The size that you'll get is max. ex. My modules size may reach ~6-10mb. I use only .it or .mptm (with VST that works only in mpt, I prefer simple reverb like Ambience or Freeverb, not VSTi). Other tracker formats are useless. Limiting yourself in features is absurd. You should realise that we are living in 2016.I've seen enough such challenges, it's better to compose quality and interesting music.
Quote from: Enumeratingw7 on July 06, 2016, 22:49:47 .it & .xm
Quote from: Enumeratingw7 on July 06, 2016, 22:49:47I'm a MilkyTracker composer which only works with xm.
QuoteOpenMPT unfortunately sometimes breaks compatibility between .xm and .it.